audio excerpt:  
                    ► 
                      11:08:00 (08:00)  
                    
                      ►  14:28:56 (09:15)  
                      
                      
                      
                       
                    aaron foster breilyn (1988) & luke
                      martin (1992) 
                    recursive retent 
                     
                      
                    01        09:27:37 
                    02        10:04:16  
                    03        10:19:44  
                    04        11:08:00  
                    05        14:28:56  
                    06        14:49:52  
                    07        16:19:59 
                     
                    performed by luke martin & aaron foster
                        breilyn for duet on one piano 
                     
                     
                     
                    recursive retent (score, 2016) 
                    for two pianists, with one piano, for a long time 
                     
                    dedicated to michael pisaro 
                    (because he watched—and liked—star wars) 
                     
                    retent: something that is retained especially in the mind 
                    recursive: a possibly infinite procedure that is determined
                    according to a rule or formula 
                     
                    definitions 
                    block >> phrase >> note 
                    a block consists of a phrase from each of the players;
                    phrases are of any number of notes. 
                     
                    instructions 
                    players should position themselves in opposite registers of
                    the piano (one high, one low). the dynamic is soft overall,
                    allowing each note to decay fully before the next (the pedal
                    can be held down by something for the duration). each phrase
                    consists of intervals of a 2nd (m/M) or 3rd (m/M) and is
                    followed by a silence approxi- mately equal to its full
                    duration. 
                     
                    around 2 minutes of silence follows each block. blocks begin
                    with a phrase from player 1 in their register, fol- lowed by
                    its repetition by player 2 in their register. these roles
                    should reverse at least once during the perfor- mance (for
                    instance, after a break or during a silence). 
                     
                    rules 
                    if player 2 deviates from player 1’s phrase, player 1 must
                    begin the phrase again immediately. player 2 should still
                    try to complete their repetition of the first phrase before
                    re-initiating their corrected repetition of the original
                    phrase. if they make another error, player 1 again repeats
                    the correct version of the phrase, and so on. 
                    should player 1 also fail to replicate their first phrase,
                    they should stop immediately. player 2 then may begin a new
                    phrase (with the roles reversed). 
                     
                     
                       
                     
                       
                    “the project involves the
                      impossible establishment of a group whose Telos would be
                      to perpetually destroy itself as a group, that is to say,
                      in Nietzschean terms: to enable the group (the
                      Living-Together) to leap beyond ressentiment” 
                    - Roland Barthes, from the zine ‘Friendship as
                        a Way of Life’ 
                       
                    this recording consists of excerpts from an eight-hour
                    performance of this piece. when playing we encountered a
                    moment in which the score’s instructions proved inadequate
                    to an unforeseen situation. it is hard to pinpoint exactly
                    when or why this happened. nonetheless, we had to decide (to
                    invent) how in that moment to at once remain abstractly
                    faithful to the score, concretely diverge from it, and also
                    take care of one another in the pro- cess. in this moment we
                    were incorporated into the actualization of a score and a
                    music that was inseparable from our relationship to one
                    another. 
                     
                     
                        
                     |